File 21 - Resika Çabuk and Yaşar Cerf

Identity area

Reference code

UGA A/A44/43/6/21

Title

Resika Çabuk and Yaşar Cerf

Date(s)

  • 1994/11/19-1997/08/01

Level of description

File

Extent and medium

2 items

Context area

Archival history

Immediate source of acquisition or transfer

Content and structure area

Scope and content

Materials pertaining to the application filed by Resika Çabuk and Yaşar Cerf on 31 March 1995 against the Republic of Turkey with the European Commission of Human Rights (referred to internally within the Kurdish Litigation Project as Case 211 and assigned to Kevin Boyle as lead) regarding the killing of Sefer Cerf, leader of the People's Democracy Party (HADEP) for Yüreğir District in Adana Province, and the wounding of his friend, HADEP Management Committee member Rebih Çabuk, when the two were fired upon at a café on 3 October 1994. The applicants accused the state of covering up the incident and noted that Ahmet Dizman (also an applicant to the Commission; see A44/43/6/29), who attempted to take Rebih Çabuk to hospital, was abducted by police the following day, tortured, and had his jaw broken with a gun butt. Rebih Çabuk died en route to hospital.
Sait Macir, also a board member of HADEP, was inside the café at the time and went outside to help the two victims. He told the authorities that he had seen the two assailants running away from the scene. Macir was taken to a police station on the pretext of giving a statement but was instead questioned about his relationship with Sefer Cerf. His café was closed by the police and he was subjected to continuous harassment after the incident. On 30 December 1994 Macir was himself shot and killed outside the same café (see A44/43/6/59).
The Essex team ultimately did not litigate the case, and the domestic investigation into the murders continued until 2013. Yaşar Cerf filed a new application (12938/07) on 15 March 2007 following conclusion of the domestic investigation. On 3 May 2016, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that there had been a violation of Article 2 of the Convention in its procedural aspect. The applicant was awarded €20,000 in damages and €3,000 in legal costs and expenses. The full judgment is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-162419

Appraisal, destruction and scheduling

Accruals

System of arrangement

Conditions of access and use area

Conditions governing access

Conditions governing reproduction

Language of material

    Script of material

      Language and script notes

      Physical characteristics and technical requirements

      Finding aids

      Allied materials area

      Existence and location of originals

      Existence and location of copies

      Related units of description

      Related descriptions

      Alternative identifier(s)

      Access points

      Subject access points

      Place access points

      Name access points

      Genre access points

      Description identifier

      Institution identifier

      Rules and/or conventions used

      Status

      Level of detail

      Dates of creation revision deletion

      Language(s)

        Script(s)

          Sources

          Accession area