Showing 48102 results

Archival description
708 results with digital objects Show results with digital objects
Report of the Commission
UGA A/A44/43/1/60/9 · File · 1994/04/08
Part of Academic

Report adopted by the European Commission of Human Rights in the Yaşa case including the original published version with corrected pages (corrigendum) and the reprinted version incorporating the corrections.. The Commission concludes:
i) by 30 votes to 2, that there has been a violation of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights in respect of the applicant and his uncle Hasim Yasa;
ii) unanimously, that there has been no violation of Article 3 of the Convention;
iii) by 31 votes to 1, that there has been no violation of Article 10 of the Convention;
(iv) by 31 votes to 1, that no separate issue arises under Article 6 paragraph 1 of the Convention;
(v) by 30 votes to 2, that no separate issue arises under Article 13 of the Convention ;
(vi) unanimously, that there has been no violation of Article 14 of the Convention;
(vii) unanimously, that there has been no violation of Article 18 of the Convention.

Report of the Commission
UGA A/A44/43/1/15/7 · File · 1997/09/18
Part of Academic

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Aytekin case.

Report of the Commission
UGA A/A44/43/1/46/10 · Item · 1996/03/06
Part of Academic

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Menteş and others application. Concerning the applicants Azize Mentes, Mahile and Sulhiye Turhalli, the Commission concluded:
i) by 27 votes to 1 that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights;
ii) by 26 votes to 2 that there had been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention;
iii) unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 5 of the Convention;
iv) by 26 votes to 2 that there had been a violation of Article 6 of the Convention;
v) by 26 votes to 2 that there had been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;
vi) unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 14 of the Convention ;
vii) unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 18 of the Convention.
Concerning the fourth applicant, Sariye Uvat, the Commission concluded, unanimously, that there had been no violation of the Convention.
The full report is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-45807

Report of the Commission
UGA A/A44/43/1/25/10 · File · 1999/09/06
Part of Academic

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Dulaş case, which declared the application admissible and expressed the opinion (unanimously) that there had been violations of Articles 3, 8, 13, and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights, that the Turkish Government failed to comply with its obligations under former Article 25 § 1 of the Convention; and that no violations of Article 2, 5, 14, or 18 had occurred. The full report is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-46210

P/P134/5/13/2/3 · Item · 12/1977
Part of Personal

Report of Seminar on Local Government in Ireland held on 13-14 December 1977 at the National Institute of Higher Education, Limerick by Limerick County Federation

UGA POL/POL37/1/33 · 12 Oct 1922
Part of Political

Report of Sean Casey Divisional Adjutant acknowledging the receipt of report and bulletin. No report of Western Command receiving ‘code’. Cannot forward Brigade diaries from the 15th to the 30th of September. Defeat of an army party by the West Clare Brigade but Free State forces in the area trebled.

Sean Casey
Report of R W de Courcy
UGA LE/LE6/2/1/6/2/433 · Item · 05/05/1915
Part of Landed Estates

Report of R W de Courcy, Civil Engineer and Architect, Lower Cecil St., Limerick, to Messrs E & G Stapleton, detailing the state of the lands in the matter of the estate of William Wilson Lynch WIlson. He outlines the property, noting that turf banks have been opened on the property recently.