Showing 48102 results

Archival description
708 results with digital objects Show results with digital objects
UGA A/A44/43/1/2/1/8 · Sub-file · 1995/12/01-1995/12/12
Part of Academic

Materials pertaining to the bringing of the Akdivar and others case before the European Court of Human Rights on the requests of the Turkish Government and the European Commission of Human Rights.

UGA A/A44/43/1/9/1/21 · Item · 1999/07/14-1999/07/19
Part of Academic

Letterfax from Camille Giffard on behalf of Bill Bowring to M.-Thérèse Schoepfer, Secretary to the European Commission of Human Rights, forwarding Sedat Aslantaş's request (in Turkish with English translation) for his case to be referred to the European Court of Human Rights in light of the Commission's decision not to refer the case. Attached is a fax from Kenan Kacar to Giffard at the Kurdish Human Rights Project forwarding Aslantaş's fax.

UGA A/A44/43/1/2/2/2 · Sub-file · 1996/01/31-1996/02/01
Part of Academic

Request filed by the Turkish Government with the European Court of Human Rights asking the Court to suspend consideration of the Akdivar and others case, along with all other applications put forth by applicants represented by people associated with the Kurdish Human Rights Project.

P/P134/12/1/2/11/70 · Item · 1950
Part of Personal

2 copies of the written submission authored by the National Executive of Muintir na Tíre to the Economic Co-operation Administration (ECA) asking for funding to establish a Parish Council Advisory Office in every parish of Ireland to give advice in matters concerning all agricultural and social services. The ECA was a body of the United States government's post-World War II European Recovery Programme; the ECA's mission to Ireland focused on agricultural investment. Inscription at top of front page: 'Original Document submitted to Department in 1950.'

UGA A/A44/43/1/19/2/22 · Item · 2004/07/20
Part of Academic

Request on behalf of Nejdet Buldan to the European Court of Human Rights to refer his case to a Grand Chamber, as the applicant believes that the judgment of 20 April 2004 'contains serious defects in its interpretation and application of principles formulated in its own jurisprudence. The effect is to leave relevant areas of the law in a state of uncertainty, as well as to have done a serious injustice to the applicant.' In particular, the applicant claims that his complaints under Article 2 of the Convention (the failure to protect the lives of himself and his brother) were inadequately addressed.

UGA POL/POL37/1/13 · Item · 26/07/1922
Part of Political

Request by the Adjutant General detailing the particulars of the instruction given to the column captured by the Brigade O/C and reports of the 'surviving' i.e. still free officers and how Keogh (an officer) escaped and with whom.