File of documents relating to the 20th anniversary publication marking the establishment of Article 19. Includes a proposal for the document with aims and objectives, a funding proposal for the publication, other research documents such as manuscript notes by Kevin Boyle on the history of Article 19, a copy of the published booklet, "Defending Free Speech" - The First Ten Years Article 19; the text of the statement by Zwelakhe Sisulu on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of founding of Article 19 (London Dec 2008) - Sisulu was defended by Article 19 in one of their first cases. Also includes copy of a an early outline and plan for Article 19 that was written by Boyle and dating from the late 1980s. Includes printed publication - "XX Speaking Out for Free Expression, 1987 - 2007 and Beyond" celebrating 20 years of Article 19. Includes article by Kevin Boyle on the origins and achievements of Article 19.
Annual review for the past 12 months for Article 19 published in Autumn 1999.
File of documents relating to the working group on Chinese journalism, including an agenda of items for discussion, reports from previous group work on Transparency and Regulation of Mass Media in China, (Galway, 2002); copy of 'Beijing turns the Screws: Freedom of Expression in Hong Kong under attack', 2004 Annual Report from Article 19 and the Hong Kong Journalists Association'; related press cuttings and research documents.
File of documents relating to the Article 19 World Report published annually and relating to the years 1988 - 1991, of which the 1988 Report Kevin Boyle was the principal author of. File includes press releases, book information, reviews, correspondence between Boyle and others regarding the writing of the Report including those at Article 19, publishers and the media. Includes separate file relating to "Freedom of Religion and Belief - A World Report" edited by Kevin Boyle and Juliet Sheen (1995) Includes draft outline for the book and details of meetings with the authors and the publisher.
Correspondence from the European Commission of Human Rights and the Turkish Government pertaining to the rules and composition of the Court and Chamber.
Materials pertaining to the 2 February 2000 hearing before the European Court of Human Rights in the Salman case and the applicant's claims for just satisfaction under Article 41 of the European Convention on Human Rights. These include Kevin Boyle and Aisling Reidy's looseleaf notes, the published case report of the European Commission of Human Rights, the Court press release regarding the case hearing, Boyle's speech on behalf of the applicant at the case hearing, and the applicant's final pleadings on the merits of the application submitted 11 November 1998 including claims for just satisfaction.
Materials pertaining to the applicant's claims for just satisfaction in the Taş case under Article 41 of the European Convention on Human Rights. These include: 1) Françoise Hampson's summary report of the 14 November 2000 case judgment; 2) a property statement received from Beşir Taş which was not submitted to the Court due to privacy concerns; 3) correspondence pertaining to the distributions and payment of the judgment; 4) Clara Sandoval's notes on the distributions and payment of various case judgments, including payment shortfalls; 5) the Turkish Government's observations submitted to the court on 18 May 2000 which asked the Court to dismiss all claims.
Materials pertaining to the applicant's claims for just satisfaction in the Yaşa case under Article 50 of the European Convention on Human Rights. These include: schedules of professional fes and costs submitted by the legal team members; the claims of the applicant submitted to the European Court of Human Rights; the reponse of the Turkish Government objecting to the claims; correspondence pertaining to the awarded judgment, and correspondence regarding payment of the sums awarded to the applicant by the Court.
Materials pertaining to the damages to be awarded to the applicants in Menteş and others, including the applicants' claims for just satisfaction under Article 50 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the Turkish Government's observations on the claims, correspondence with the European Court of Human Rights, the judgment of the Court published on 24 July 1998, and banking details of the legal team. The full judgment made under Article 50 of the Convention is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58206
Correspondence between the University of Essex Department of Law, Kurdish Human Rights Project, European Court of Human Rights, and the Turkish Government pertaining to the applicants' claims for just satisfaction under Article 50 of the European Convention on Human Rights, including schedules of costs and discussion of the so-called 'protocol' (see A44/43/1/2/2/3/2) authored by the Government.