1) Memorial of the applicant in the Salman case submitted 2 December 1999 to the European Court of Human Rights, including the applicant's claims for just satisfaction, the applicant's power of attorney, and a report on the unreliability of testimony by and of gendarmes in cases litigated through the European Commission of Human Rights and European Court of Human Rights;
2) Schedules of professional fees and costs incurred by the applicant’s legal team;
3) Claims for legal aid purposes filled by representatives Aisling Reidy and Metin Kılavuz pertaining to the 2 February 2000 case hearing in Strasbourg;
4) Summary of the 27 June 2000 case judgment;
5) Correspondence pertaining to the distribution and payment of the judgment awarded to the applicant and her legal representatives.
Applicants' memorial, 'A note on the decisions of the domestic courts submitted by the Turkish Government to the Commission in support of their argument that domestic remedies had not been exhausted by the applicants in Akdivar & others v. Turkey', authored by Osman Doğru, Marmara University, İstanbul, in response to the dissenting opinion (A44/43/1/2/1/6/3) of two judges regarding the admissibility of the case. The memorial calls into question the accountability of the Turkish administration and officials, as well as the concept of redress. Included is an appendix, 'The Judgments of State Council', in Turkish with English translations.
Memorial of the applicants in the Akdeniz and others case submitted to the European Court of Human Rights (in English), including appendices in both English and Turkish. Includes a file copy (15pp) and a draft copy (13pp; missing final page).
Memorial of the applicants in the Akdeniz and others case submitted to the European Court of Human Rights (in English), including appendices in both English and Turkish.
Memorial of the applicants in the Akdeniz and others case (A44/43/1/1) submitted to the European Court of Human Rights (in English), including appendices in both English and Turkish.
Observations on the merits of the Salih Çetin application against Turkey submitted by the applicant to the European Commission of Human Rights.
Observations on the merits of the Abdurrahman Çelikbilek application against Turkey submitted by the applicant on 8 October 1999 and 1 March 2000, including the applicant's claims for just satisfaction.
Replies of the applicants to the observations of the Government of Turkey.
Photocopy of the replies of the applicants to the observations of the Government of Turkey, and of Kevin Boyle's enclosing letter to H.C. Krüger, Secretary to the European Commission of Human Rights, which accompanied the replies.
Reply of the applicant to the observations of the Turkish Government on the Nasır İlhan application. The reply states that the Government has not produced any evidence to show that it is investigating the allegations nor has it shown that domestic remedies are effective. Attached is a statement (in Turkish with English translation) from Mahmut Şakar, secretary of the Diyarbakır Branch of the Human Rights Association, stating that the supposed signature on Abdüllatif İlhan's attributed statement of 26 December 1992 (A44/43/1/38/4) was likely a scribble produced by forcibly moving his hand and that Abdüllatif İlhan would not have been able to sign on his own due both to his illiteracy and to his injuries.