Showing 46747 results

Supplementary observations submitted to the European Commission of Human Rights on behalf of applicants Hüseyin and Devrim Berktay. The observations state that it was at the hands of the police that Devrim Berktay fell from the balcony and it was the same police who prevented his father from taking him to receive treatment, and that the Government has failed to respond effectively to these events in the 22 months since the accident. The observations also state that the police used the medical condition of Devrim to force Hüseyin Berktay to sign a statement that he had not made nor believed to be true, and that the search of the Berktay who performed without a valid search warrant or the applicants' permission.

Final observations prepared by Kevin Boyle and Tony Fisher on behalf of the applicants on the merits of the application in the Berktay case submitted to the European Commission of Human Rights. The applicants restate their previous claims and state that whether or not he jumped or was pushed, 'the implication is irresistible that the responsibility for his falling from the balcony was that of the anti-terror police.'

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Eşref Yaşa case (A44/43/1/60), which concluded that there had been a violation of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (30 votes to 2), that there had been no violations of Article 3, 14, and 18 of the Convention (unanimously), and that there had been no violation of Article 10 of the Convention (31 votes to 1).
The full report is available for viewing https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-45867

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Tekin case (A44/43/1/56), which concluded that there had been a violation of Articles 3 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights (31 votes to 1), and that there had been no violations of Articles 2, 10, 14, and 18 of the Convention.
The full report is available for viewing https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-45868

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Mahmut Kaya case (A44/43/1/40), which concluded that: there had been a violation of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (unanimously), that there had been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention in respect of the applicant’s brother (26 votes to 2) and none in respect of the applicant (unanimously), and that there had been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention (27 votes to 1).
The full report is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-46142

Published report (3 copies) of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Mehmet Gül case (A44/43/1/32), which unanimously concluded that there had been violations of Articles 2 and 13 of the European Convention of Human Rights. The full report is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-46227

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Mehmet Kaya case (A44/43/1/41), which concluded that there had been violations of Articles 2 and 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (27 votes to 3), and that there had been no violations of Article 3 and 14 of the Convention (unanimously).
The full report is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-45852

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Şemsi Önen case (A44/43/1/47) which concluded unanimously that there had been violations of Articles 2 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights and that there had been no violations of Articles 3, 8, and 14 of the Convention. The applicant's name has been spelled 'Şemse' rather than 'Şemsi' in the report.
On 16 March 1993, the applicant’s parents, Ibrahim and Mome, and her older brother Orhan were killed and the applicant injured in her foot, allegedly as a result of a planned action by members of the Balpınar village guards to kill the applicant’s brother Orhan. (2 copies)
The full report is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-46212
On 7 March 2000, Kevin Boyle and Françoise Hampson stood down from the case in favour of Philip Leach of the Kurdish Human Rights Project. The full judgment in the case is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-60451

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Gülten Aytekin case, which declared the application admissible and expressed the opinion that: there had been a violation of Article 2 of the Convention (29 votes to 1), and that not separate violation had occurred under Article 13 of the Convention (29 votes to 1). (2 copies)

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Ersöz and others case (A44/43/1/30), which concluded that there had been a violation of Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights (unanimously), that there had not been a violation of Article 14 of the Convention (15 votes to 2), and that it was not necessary to examine whether there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (unanimously). The full report is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-46141