Showing 46747 results

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Hüseyin Güleç case, which concluded that there had been a violation of Article 2 of the European Convention of Human Rights (30 votes to 1). The applicant’s son, Ahmet Güleç, aged 15, was killed on 4 March 1991 by a bullet fired by gendarmes at student demonstrators during a protest at İdil Senior High School, Şırnak Province. Kevin Boyle, Françoise Hampson, and the Kurdish Litigation Project were not involved in this case. The full report is available for viewing in French at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-47466

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Hüseyin Güleç case, which concluded that there had been a violation of Article 2 of the European Convention of Human Rights (30 votes to 1). The applicant’s son, Ahmet Güleç, aged 15, was killed on 4 March 1991 by a bullet fired by gendarmes at student demonstrators during a protest at İdil Senior High School, Şırnak Province. Kevin Boyle, Françoise Hampson, and the Kurdish Litigation Project were not involved in this case. The full report is available for viewing in French at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-47466

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Akdivar and others case (A44/43/1/2), which declared the application admissible and expressed the opinion that: there had been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention (18 votes to 1), that there had been violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention (18 votes to 1), that there had been a violation of Article 2 of the Convention (14 votes to 5), that there no violation of Article 5 of the Convention (unanimously), that there had been a violation of Article 6 paragraph 1 of the Convention (12 votes to 7), that there had been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention (12 votes to 7), that there had been no violations of Articles 14 and 18 of the Convention (unanimously), and that Turkey had failed to comply with its obligations under former Article 25 of the Convention (12 votes to 7). The Commission decided unanimously not to consider the complaints brought in the name of Hüseyin Akdivar following his oral testimony in which he stated that his signature on a power of attorney form was not his and that he did not wish to make an application, and to pursue the examination of the application, insofar as all the other applicants are concerned. (2 copies)
The full report is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-45763

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Salman case, which ruled unanimously that there had been violations of Articles 2, 3, and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and that Turkey failed to comply withy its obligations under former Article 25 paragraph 1 of the Convention.

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Salman case (A44/43/1/51), which unanimously concluded that there had been violations of Articles 2, 3, and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights, that there had been no violations of Article 18 of the Convention, and that Turkey had failed to comply with their obligations under former Article 25 paragraph 1 of the Convention. (2 copies)
The full report is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-46160

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Aksoy case (A44/43/1/5), which declared the application admissible and expressed the opinion that: there had been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention (15 votes to 1), that there had been a violation of Article 5 paragraph 3 of the Convention (15 votes to 1), that there had been a violation of Article 6 paragraph 1 of the Convention (13 votes to 3), that no separate issue arose under Article 13 of the Convention (13 votes to 3), and that no action needed to be taken with regard to Article 25 (unanimously). The full report is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-45764

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Gündem case (A44/43/1/33), which concluded that there had been a violation of Article 6 paragraph 1of the European Convention of Human Rights (26 votes to 3), and that there had been no violation of articles 3, 5 paragraph 1, 8, 18, and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention. (2 copies)
The full report is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-45842

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Hasan İlhan case (A44/43/1/37), which concluded that there had been a violation of Article 2 the European Convention of Human Rights (27 votes to 5), that there had been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention (unanimously), that there had been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention (29 votes to 3), and that there had been no violation of Article 14 of the Convention (unanimously).
The full report is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-46170

Published report of the European Commission of Human Rights on the Kılıç case (A44/43/1/42), which concluded that there had been violations of Articles 2 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights (unanimously). (2 copies)
The full report is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-46137

Observations (in English) submitted by the Turkish Government to the European Commission of Human Rights on the admissibility of the Berktay application. The Government asks the Commission to adjourn its examination until the preliminary domestic investigation into the events of 3 February 1993 is concluded.