Showing 46747 results

Observations on the merits of the Salih Çetin application against Turkey submitted by the applicant to the European Commission of Human Rights.

Observations on the merits of the Abdurrahman Çelikbilek application against Turkey submitted by the applicant on 8 October 1999 and 1 March 2000, including the applicant's claims for just satisfaction.

Draft of the applicant's observations on the domestic investigation documents submitted by the Turkish Government on 16 August 1999. The observations note that it took three years for the Government to respond to the request to submit the investigation files, and this combined with the documents in said files demonstrates an unwillingness to seriously investigate the Savaş Buldan murder. (2 copies)

Draft of the applicant's observations on the domestic investigation documents submitted by the Turkish Government on 16 August 1999. The observations note that it took three years for the Government to respond to the request to submit the investigation files, and this combined with the documents in said files demonstrates an unwillingness to seriously investigate the Savaş Buldan murder. Appended are English translations of statements of the Bakırköy Chief Public prosecutor, and a witness statements taken by police from Sebahattin Uz, the doorman at the Çınar Hotel who witnessed Buldan's abduction (these appendices appear in the file table of contents as Appendices A, B, and C). The draft is enclosed by an unsigned letter to Sheldon Leader asking for his thoughts on the observations and listing questions they may want to follow up on as the case proceeds. The above documents are enclosed by a letter from Leader and Kevin Boyle to the European Court of Human Rights.

Reply of the applicant to the Turkish Government's observations in the Ramazan Beyaz case. The applicant submits that the Government has not actually addressed any of the applicant's claims in their observations. Include file draft and submitted copy.

Observations on the merits of the Mehmet Gül case submitted on behalf of the applicant to the European Commission of Human Rights on 26 July 1999. The applicant states that the 'entire investigation undertaken by different agencies was fundamentally defective' and that the lethal forced used against the applicant's son was deliberate and unjustified. Appendices include two reports on the use of ballistics and firearms, excerpts from an Amnesty International report discussing the younger Mehmet Gül's death, and minutes of a conversation with a photographer commissioned by the Bozova Public Prosecutor who was at the scene of the incident.

Applicants' observations on the merits of the Mahmut Demir and Sıddık Yaşa applications restating the multiple violations of the European Convention on Human Rights of the Turkish Government alleged by the applicants.

Applicant's observations on the merits of the İhsan Bilgin case against Turkey regarding the burning of his house and possessions by gendarmes, submitted to the European Commission of Human Rights.

Draft of the applicant's observations on the domestic investigation documents submitted by the Turkish Government on 16 August 1999.

Draft of Françoise Hampson's speech on behalf at the oral hearing in the case of Taş v. Turkey held on 17 January 1996 at the Human Rights Building in Strasbourg. The draft is heavily annotated with corrections and pronunciation guidance for Turkish and Kurdish proper nouns.