Manuscript

Elements area

Taxonomy

Code

Scope note(s)

    Source note(s)

      Display note(s)

        Hierarchical terms

        Manuscript

          Equivalent terms

          Manuscript

            Associated terms

            Manuscript

              6367 Archival description results for Manuscript

              6367 results directly related Exclude narrower terms
              UGA G/G17/2/54/541 · Item · 06/08/1969
              Part of Gaeilge

              Letter from Allen Figgis, Figgis & Co Ltd, Dawson Street, Dublin, to Eoghan Ó Tuairisc, Maganey recommending that they take on Ó Flóinn's suggestions on the book. He vents his frustration at printers, complaining that all the paper stock was taken over at the election. He asks for his corrected proofs on the book back and he will look forward a reprint then.

              UGA G/G17/2/54/542 · Item · 06/08/1969
              Part of Gaeilge

              Letter from Allen Figgis, Figgis & Co Ltd, Dawson Street, Dublin, to Eoghan Ó Tuairisc, Maganey commenting that the business if frustrating. He will know on Monday if they can lithograph the changes or have to re-set, which would take three months. He suggests they append the guide at present, and in a reprint repaginate accordingly.

              Letter from Allen Figgis
              UGA G/G17/2/54/543 · Item · 03/10/1969
              Part of Gaeilge

              "Letter from Allen Figgis, Figgis & Co Ltd, Dawson Street, Dublin, to Eoghan Ó Tuairisc, Maganey returning proofs for ""Dé Luain"", asking him to repaginate the notes, note any corrections on a slip of paper, and return directly to O'Gorman."

              Letter from Allen Figgis
              UGA G/G17/2/54/544 · Item · 09/03/1970
              Part of Gaeilge

              Letter from Allen Figgis, Figgis & Co Ltd, Dawson Street, Dublin, to Eoghan Ó Tuairisc, Maganey apologising for not sending the cheques sooner as they are out of date and asking if he could deal with them, as he is off to Philadelphia in the morning.

              Letter from Allen Figgis
              UGA G/G17/2/54/545 · Item · 19/03/1970
              Part of Gaeilge

              "Letter from Allen Figgis, Figgis & Co Ltd, Dawson Street, Dublin, to Eoghan Ó Tuairisc, Maganey commenting that the trip to New York was ""potentially very exciting"". He comments that he would not like anyone else to work on ""Weekend"", commenting that he is the ""only authority"". He is glad that he wants ""Trio"" back as it does need to be reworked."

              UGA G/G17/2/54/546 · Item · 1970
              Part of Gaeilge

              Notice from Figgis & Co. Ltd. to Eoghan Ó Tuairisc that they are redeeming their preference shares and asking him to return them in a month as they will be of no further value.

              UGA G/G17/2/54/547 · Item · 21/03/1970
              Part of Gaeilge

              "Draft typescript letter with amendments from Eoghan Ó Tuairisc, Maganey, to S E Allen Figgis, Allen Figgis & Co Ltd., Dawson St., Dublin thanking him for returning ""Trio in D"". In relation to ""Weekend"" he disagrees with him, and feels that he must be allowed to be the ""final arbiter of my own work"". He comments that the Coda is apt to be misunderstood, and that it implies the Ricorse or wheel and that Dermot might escape. The new ending does not allow for any misunderstanding ""Dermot is dead, good and proper"". He comments that he would much prefer the double anchor imprint rather than the Joycean riverrun. He comments that Miss Engel's thesis was a real eye-opener, and that the assumption that he is the only author is ""an intolerable dogma"". He states that he has instructed his literary executors on the matter whatever the outcome, and asks him to consider the matter further."

              UGA G/G17/2/54/549 · Item · 24/03/1970
              Part of Gaeilge

              "Letter from Allen Figgis, Figgis & Co Ltd, Dawson Street, Dublin, to Eoghan Ó Tuairisc, Maganey, saying not to take was he said too seriously, and that of course he was the final arbiter of his own work. He comments that the ""Weekend"" might well have been thrown out by Eoghan ""had it not been for my brilliant insight and appreciation"", and asking for him to let him know how the poem should finish now and he has lost his earlier letter."