Showing 48122 results

This sub-subseries contains correspondence of the organisation and is arranged chronologically.

Tag / Ref: G60/11/3/5

This subseries consists of correspondence relating to Seachtain na Gaeilge, and is arranged in chronological order. It also includes promotional material including badge samples [15/2/1/2] and material relating to Comórtas Gael Earraí 1977-79 [G60/15/2/1/4].

Tag / Ref: G60/15/2

Correspondence authored, received, and/or compiled by Kevin Boyle, Aisling Reidy, and Françoise Hampson pertaining to the Eşref Yaşa case. The correspondence is with the European Commission of Human Rights, the European Court of Human Rights, the Kurdish Human Rights Project, and the Diyarbakır-based legal team members. Notable items within this correspondence accessible to the public include: Yaşa’s supplementary statement of 9 November 1993 regarding death threats he received for applying to the Commission; letters which accompanied documents and observations submitted on behalf of the applicants; requests on behalf of the applicant for extensions of document submission deadlines; Mahmut Şakar’s statement of 31 May 1994 (submitted 24 April 1995); Yaşa’s 14 July 1995 declaration of means; the Commission’s 9 July 1997 referral of the case to the Court; Yaşa’s letters of legal authorisation for Boyle, Hampson, and Osman Baydemir submitted 13 January 1998; correspondence pertaining to the 21 April 1998 case hearing in Strasbourg; and the Court’s letter of 10 August 1998 informing that a judgment will be adopted.
NOTE: Correspondence and associated materials within the file that were created by either the European Commission of Human Rights or the Government of Turkey are not permitted to be accessed until 1 November 2073.

Procedural correspondence between Kevin Boyle/Françoise Hampson, the European Commission for Human Rights, and the European Court of Human Rights pertaining to the Menteş and others case, including posted copies of the Turkish Government's memorial, correspondence pertaining to the 22 January 1997 case hearing and the court decision to refer the case to a Grand Chamber.

Correspondence authored, received, and/or compiled by Kevin Boyle, Françoise Hampson, and Aisling Reidy pertaining to the Beyaz case. he correspondence is with the European Commission of Human Rights, the European Court of Human Rights, and the Kurdish Human Rights Project. Notable items within this correspondence accessible to the public include: letters which accompanied documents and observations submitted on behalf of the applicant, acknowledgment of received correspondence, and lists of potential case hearing witnesses.

Correspondence authored, received, and/or compiled by Kevin Boyle, Aisling Reidy, and Françoise Hampson pertaining to the Çetin case. The correspondence is with the European Commission of Human Rights. Notable items within this correspondence accessible to the public include: the notice of application; letters which accompanied documents and observations submitted on behalf of the applicant; proposal; letters on behalf of the applicant pertaining to the 6 November 1995 including lists of proposed witnesses; the applicant’s claims for just satisfaction in the case filed 29 July 1997; correspondence and letters pertaining to the errant payment of the awarded costs for legal fees directly to Çetin without informing him what the payment was for which resulted in him spending the money to pay off debts rather than reimbursing the costs.

Correspondence authored, received, and/or compiled by Bill Bowring, Kevin Boyle, and Françoise Hampson pertaining to the Çelikbilek case. The correspondence is with the European Commission of Human Rights, the European Court of Human Rights, and the Kurdish Human Rights Project. Notable items within this correspondence accessible to the public include: the notice of application; letters which accompanied documents and observations submitted on behalf of the applicant; requests from the applicant's representatives requesting extensions for document submissions; responses to the offer of legal aid to the applicant from the Commission; the 2 July 1999 notice of the Court that application was declared admissible on 22 June 1999; Bowring and Boyle's request of 4 August 199 9 the Court to carry out in investigation of the case to provide clarification of the case facts; letters from the Court requesting information from the applicant’s representatives; letters from the Court which accompanied submitted documents and observations received from the Government; a 13 September 1999 fax from lawyer Cihan Aydın providing Abdurrahman Çelikbilek's statement of 8 September 1999 regarding his detainment and various witnesses; the 23 November 1999 decision of the Court not to take oral evidence in the case; letters from the Court associated with the delivery of the case judgment; letters regarding the applicant's claims for just satisfaction; the schedule of pecuniary damages; and the Turkish Government's 19 May 2000 observations on the applicant's claims for just satisfaction.

Correspondence authored, received, and/or compiled by Sheldon Leader, Kevin Boyle, and Françoise Hampson pertaining to the Buldan case. The correspondence is with the European Commission of Human Rights, the European Court of Human Rights, and the Kurdish Human Rights Project. Notable items within this correspondence accessible to the public include: letters which accompanied documents and observations submitted on behalf of the applicant; the notice provided by Leader, Boyle and Hampson on 21 May 1998 that Savaş Buldan was killed by agents of the State as per the Susurluk Report; requests from the applicant's representatives requesting extensions for document submissions; letters from the Court requesting information from the applicant’s representatives and accordant letters of acknowledgment of receipt; and letters from the Court which accompanied submitted documents and observations received from the Government.

Correspondence authored, received, and/or compiled by Kevin Boyle, Philip Leach, and Françoise Hampson pertaining to the Bilgin case. The correspondence is with the European Commission of Human Rights, the European Court of Human Rights, and the Kurdish Human Rights Project. Notable items within this correspondence accessible to the public include the notice of the 3 February 2000 decision by the Court declaring the application admissible and the 17 March 2000 letter sent to the Court by the Turkish Government complaining about the decision to hold fact-finding hearings in the case.

Correspondence authored, received, and/or compiled by Kevin Boyle, Aisling Reidy, and Françoise Hampson pertaining to the Bilgin case. The correspondence is with the European Commission of Human Rights, the European Court of Human Rights, and the Kurdish Human Rights Project. Notable items within this correspondence accessible to the public include: the notice of application; letters which accompanied documents and observations submitted on behalf of the applicant; correspondence attempting to clarify İhsan Bilgin's age resulting from an error on his birth certificate; correspondence regarding the Government coercion of Bilgin into signing a 9 August 1995 statement denying that he had applied to the Commission, including Bilgin's statement to the Commission of 21 August 1995 refuting his 9 August statement; İhsan Bilgin's 30 August 1995 declaration of means; composition of the Chamber hearing the case; documents pertaining to the hearing in the case held on 10-14 March 1997 in Ankara including lists of witnesses and attempts to contact them; requests from the applicant's representatives requesting extensions for document submissions; responses to the offer of legal aid to the applicant from the Commission; the 30 October 1999 transfer of the case from the Commission to the Court; letters from the Court requesting information from the applicant’s representatives; letters from the Court which accompanied submitted documents and observations received from the Government; offers of legal aid from the Court; letters from the Court associated with the delivery of the case judgment; letters regarding the applicants' claims for just satisfaction; schedules of professional fees and costs; correspondence regarding the 26 October 2000 adoption of the judgment of the case; and correspondence regarding the payment of the awarded judgment.