Contact sheet and corresponding negative sheet containing 23 images.
Indexed Sullane Reticulation. Images of a tree, and flowing water. Billy Keady at a grand piano, someone nearby with a double bass. Photographs of a camera crew setting up.
Contact sheet and corresponding negative sheet containing 23 images.
Indexed Sullane Reticulation. Images of a tree, and flowing water. Billy Keady at a grand piano, someone nearby with a double bass. Photographs of a camera crew setting up.
Statement (in Turkish with English translation) of Şükrü Kaplan, resident of Oyuklu village, Lice District, Diyarbakır Province, whose son Halil disappeared while in the custody of gendarmes on 19 May 1993. The file (referred to internally with the Kurdish Litigation Project as Case 66) has been labelled as 'not to be submitted'. (3 copies)
Applicant's final pleadings on the merits of the application in the Şükran Aydın case. The observations note the harassment and detention endured by Şükran Aydın, her husband Abit (or Abid/Abidin) Aydın, and other family members and neighbours since word was received by the Turkish Government of Şükran's application to the European Commission of Human Rights. The pleadings detail the difficulties faced by the couple as they attempted to leave for the case hearing in Strasbourg, and states that the couple's house has been raided twice since returning from Strasbourg (events which had been noted by the Commission and resulted in a 8 December 1995 warning to Turkish authorities) and that Abid Aydın had been taken into custody twice during December 1995 and severely beaten. The pleadings also make note that the testimony of the doctors given at the hearing heavily implies that unwilling sexual intercourse had occurred during the timeframe stated by the applicant. The pleadings are enclosed by a letter from Françoise Hampson to H.C. Krüger, Secretary to the European Commission of Human Rights.
Materials pertaining to the case filed by Şükran Aydın against the Republic of Turkey with the European Commission of Human Rights (application number 23178/94, later given case number 57/1996/676/866, referred to internally within the Kurdish Litigation Project as Case 74 and assigned to Françoise Hampson as lead) regarding her arrest, torture, and rape by members of the Turkish security forces between 29 June and 2 July 1993.
At the time of the events, Aydın was 17 years old and living with her family in Taşıt, Derik District, Mardin Province. According to Aydın, she was arrested in the village in the early hours of 29 June 1993 alongside her father, Seydo Aydın, and her sister-in-law, Farahdiba Akşın. The three were taken by village guards and gendarmes to the Derik gendarmerie headquarters. There, the applicant was blindfolded, beaten, stripped naked, placed in a tyre, and hosed with pressurised water. She was then taken to another room where she was raped by a member of the security forces. She and the other members of her family were released after three days, on or about 2 July 1993. On 8 July 1993, the three family members filed a complaint about their treatment with the Derik Public Prosecutor’s Office, and Şükran Aydın underwent three medical examinations in July and August 1993. The Government of Turkey denied that Aydın and her family members were ever taken into custody, called her allegations unsubstantiated, but nevertheless opened an investigation which later reported that there was no evidence to support the applicant’s complaints.
On 25 September 1997, the European Court of Human Rights dismissed the Government’s objections regarding the exhaustion of domestic remedies (18 votes to 3) and abuse of process (unanimously). The Court held that Şükran Aydın had been subjected to torture through being raped and otherwise ill-treated contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (14 votes to 7); that she had noted been afforded an effective remedy in respect to her complaint contrary to Article 13 (16 votes to 5); that no violation of Article 25 § 1 had been established (unanimously); and that it was not necessary to consider the remainder of the complaints. The Court held 18 votes to 3 that Turkey should pay the applicant £25,000 sterling in non-pecuniary damages, and 16 votes to 5 that Turkey should pay Şükran Aydın’s United Kingdom-based legal representatives £34,360 sterling less 19,145 French francs, and her Turkish representatives £3,000 sterling. The full judgment is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-58371.
Additional materials pertaining to this case are located at A44/43/6/11.
Supplementary materials pertaining to the case filed by Şükran Aydın against the Republic of Turkey with the European Commission of Human Rights (application number 23178/94, later given case number 57/1996/676/866, referred to internally within the Kurdish Litigation Project as Case 74 and assigned to Françoise Hampson as lead) regarding her arrest, torture, and rape by members of the Turkish security forces between 29 June and 2 July 1993. Materials from the main casefile are located at A44/43/14.
At the time of the events, Aydın was 17 years old and living with her family in Taşıt, Derik District, Mardin Province. According to Aydın, she was arrested in the village in the early hours of 29 June 1993 alongside her father, Seydo Aydın, and her sister-in-law, Farahdiba Akşın. The three were taken by village guards and gendarmes to the Derik gendarmerie headquarters. There, the applicant was blindfolded, beaten, stripped naked, placed in a tyre, and hosed with pressurised water. She was then taken to another room where she was raped by a member of the security forces. She and the other members of her family were released after three days, on or about 2 July 1993. On 8 July 1993, the three family members filed a complaint about their treatment with the Derik Public Prosecutor’s Office, and Şükran Aydın underwent three medical examinations in July and August 1993. The Government of Turkey denied that Aydın and her family members were ever taken into custody, called her allegations unsubstantiated, but nevertheless opened an investigation which later reported that there was no evidence to support the applicant’s complaints.
On 25 September 1997, the European Court of Human Rights dismissed the Government’s objections regarding the exhaustion of domestic remedies (18 votes to 3) and abuse of process (unanimously). The Court held that Şükran Aydın had been subjected to torture through being raped and otherwise ill-treated contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (14 votes to 7); that she had noted been afforded an effective remedy in respect to her complaint contrary to Article 13 (16 votes to 5); that no violation of Article 25 § 1 had been established (unanimously); and that it was not necessary to consider the remainder of the complaints. The Court held 18 votes to 3 that Turkey should pay the applicant £25,000 sterling in non-pecuniary damages, and 16 votes to 5 that Turkey should pay Şükran Aydın’s United Kingdom-based legal representatives £34,360 sterling less 19,145 French francs, and her Turkish representatives £3,000 sterling. The full judgment is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-58371
Old leather suitcase, initialled G.C.O'B. in which all material relating to this series was stored.
Tag / Ref: G60/25/5
"Handwritten draft of song entitled ""Suisocín Bán"", from Mrs Hackett."
"Handwritten draft of song beginning ""Suil doill anois fá chríoch""."
"Handwritten rough draft of song beginning ""Suid é siar an bother é"" from Thomas Ridge, Connamara."
"Handwritten rough draft of song beginning ""Suid é siar an bother é"" from Thomas Ridge, Connamara."