Showing 48102 results

Reply of the applicant to the Turkish Government's initial observations on the Salih Tekin application. The applicant states that despite his detailed complaint recorded by the Derik public prosecutor, no security forces have been prosecuted to date and the Government has not actually acted on any of the applicant's complaints of ill-treatment, showing the ineffectiveness of domestic remedies.

Response of the applicant in the Buldan case to the observations of the Turkish Government, as well as drafts of the response and translation of appended witness statements.

Response of the applicant in the Bilgin case to the previous observations of the Turkish Government.

Draft of the applicant's reply to the Turkish Government's observations on the admissibility and merits of the Aktaş application. The reply states that evidence given to the court in the hearings in Mardin was clearly valueless, that the Government has not denied the evidence of serious bruising in the initial autopsy, that simply contending that there can be no discrimination under law is not evidence in and of itself, and repeats the submissions made in the application.

Reply of the applicant to the observations of the Turkish Government on the Toğcu application. The applicant notes that the Government does not address any observations or arguments made by the applicant, instead making a number of assertions without proper investigation, many of which are irrelevant to the case. The applicant asks the Commission to declare the application admissible. (2 copies)

Applicants' reply to the Turkish Government's observations on the admissibility and merits of the Ayder and others application, plus a summary of the applicants' legal arguments.

Reply of the applicants to the Observations of the Government of Turkey, including appendices.

Reply of the applicants to the Observations of the Government of Turkey, including appendices.

Reply of the applicants to the supplementary observations of the Government of Turkey submitted on 30 May 1995 (A44/43/1/8/8/1).

1) Reply of the applicant to the observations of the Turkish Government on the Hasan İlhan application. The reply states that 'The government does not address the merits at all but relies on its objection to the representation of the applicant by his legal representatives. Nothing in the government's observations calls into question any relevant fact or argument in the applicant's original submission'. Attached are two reports on the ineffectiveness of remedies before regional administrative councils in Turkey.
2) Decision published 17 October 1994 by the European Commission of Human Rights unanimously deeming the application of Hasan İlhan against Turkey admissible. The back page is embossed with the Commission's seal. (CLOSED UNTIL 2073/11/01)