Showing 48102 results

Memorial of the applicant in the Mahmut Kaya case submitted to the European Court of Human Rights, including the applicant's claims for just satisfaction.

Memorial of the applicant in the Nasır İlhan case submitted to the European Court of Human Rights, including appendices which include schedules of damages claimed and of legal costs and fees, a report authored by Suzy Sumner compiling the inadequacies uncovered in ECHR reports and judgments regarding the Turkish investigations into the various Kurdish human rights cases being litigated at the time, and a report on the unreliability of gendarme testimony.

Memorial of the applicants in the Ersöz and others (Özgür Gündem) case submitted to the European Court of Human Rights, including the applicants' claims for just satisfaction.

Memorial of the applicant submitted to the European Court of Human Rights in the Taş case, including the applicant's claims for just satisfaction. The memorial states that there is now enough evidence to suggest that Muhsin Taş has died. Appendices include schedules of damages claims, schedules of professional legal fees and costs, and an expert report analysing Muhsin Taş’s medical reports.

Memorial of the applicant in the Tanrıkulu case submitted 4 February 1999 to the European Court of Human Rights, restating the applicant's claims and noting the interference with the applicant as stated in the European Commission of Human Rights' case report. Appendices include the applicant's claims for just satisfaction, a signed statement from Selma Tanrıkulu indicating her wish to participate in proceedings before the Court and nominating her legal representatives, sketches of the crime scene, articles pertaining to the dangers faced by health services professionals in southeast Turkey and the ineffectiveness of domestic remedies in Turkey, and schedules of legal costs and expenses provided by the applicant's representatives. The Court Registrar received the applicant’s memorial on 5 February 1999. The Government’s memorial was received on 16 February 1999 after the expiry of the time allowed, which had already been extended at the Government’s request. On 17 February 1999 the President of the Court declined to give leave for inclusion of the Government’s memorial in the case file.

Memorial of the applicant in the Şarlı case, including claims for just satisfaction, including the applicant's claims for just satisfaction, schedules of professional fees and costs incurred by the applicant’s legal representatives, and a report on the unreliability of testimony by and of gendarmes in cases litigated through the European Commission of Human Rights and European Court of Human Rights.

Memorial of the applicant in the Ekinci case submitted to the European Court of Human Rights.

Memorial of the applicants in the Dulaş case submitted to the European Court of Human Rights, including schedules of costs for just satisfaction.

Memorial of the applicants in the Ayder and others case submitted to the European Court of Human Rights, including schedules of costs for just satisfaction.

1) Memorial of the applicant in the Gündem case submitted to the European Court of Human Rights on 15 June 1997, including appendices (statements made by the applicant and other villagers, and documentation pertaining to similar cases). In the memorial, the applicant does not contest the European Commission of Human Rights' conclusion that the events of January and February 1993 have not been established beyond a reasonable doubt; 2) Drafts of Kevin Boyle's speech made on behalf of the applicant at the 23 September 1997 case hearing, including annotations, corrections, and additional notes.