Showing 46747 results

Memorial of the applicant in the Şarlı case, including claims for just satisfaction, including the applicant's claims for just satisfaction, schedules of professional fees and costs incurred by the applicant’s legal representatives, and a report on the unreliability of testimony by and of gendarmes in cases litigated through the European Commission of Human Rights and European Court of Human Rights.

Memorial of the applicant in the Ekinci case submitted to the European Court of Human Rights.

Memorial of the applicants in the Dulaş case submitted to the European Court of Human Rights, including schedules of costs for just satisfaction.

Folder tab created by the legal team; no subsequent content.

Memorial of the applicant in the Aytekin case submitted to the European Court of Human Rights, including schedules of costs for just satisfaction.

1) Memorial of the applicant in the Gündem case submitted to the European Court of Human Rights on 15 June 1997, including appendices (statements made by the applicant and other villagers, and documentation pertaining to similar cases). In the memorial, the applicant does not contest the European Commission of Human Rights' conclusion that the events of January and February 1993 have not been established beyond a reasonable doubt; 2) Drafts of Kevin Boyle's speech made on behalf of the applicant at the 23 September 1997 case hearing, including annotations, corrections, and additional notes.

1) Memorial of the applicant in the Salman case submitted 2 December 1999 to the European Court of Human Rights, including the applicant's claims for just satisfaction, the applicant's power of attorney, and a report on the unreliability of testimony by and of gendarmes in cases litigated through the European Commission of Human Rights and European Court of Human Rights;
2) Schedules of professional fees and costs incurred by the applicant’s legal team;
3) Claims for legal aid purposes filled by representatives Aisling Reidy and Metin Kılavuz pertaining to the 2 February 2000 case hearing in Strasbourg;
4) Summary of the 27 June 2000 case judgment;
5) Correspondence pertaining to the distribution and payment of the judgment awarded to the applicant and her legal representatives.

Memorial of the applicants in the Akdeniz and others case (A44/43/1/1) submitted to the European Court of Human Rights (in English), including appendices in both English and Turkish.

Reply of the applicant to the observations of the Turkish Government on the Nasır İlhan application. The reply states that the Government has not produced any evidence to show that it is investigating the allegations nor has it shown that domestic remedies are effective. Attached is a statement (in Turkish with English translation) from Mahmut Şakar, secretary of the Diyarbakır Branch of the Human Rights Association, stating that the supposed signature on Abdüllatif İlhan's attributed statement of 26 December 1992 (A44/43/1/38/4) was likely a scribble produced by forcibly moving his hand and that Abdüllatif İlhan would not have been able to sign on his own due both to his illiteracy and to his injuries.

Reply of the applicant in the Şarlı case to the observations of the Turkish Government submitted to the European Commission of Human Rights. The reply states that the objections of the Government are paradoxical in that they refute the allegations yet continue to domestic pursue an investigation. The reply notes that five of the statements submitted by the Government are not relevant because they were made by people who did witness the kidnappings, and calls into question the accuracy of the statement attributed to Mrs Cemile Şarlı.