Showing 49560 results

Archival description
708 results with digital objects Show results with digital objects
Translation services
UGA G/G60/7/7 · Sub-series · [1970]-2006
Part of Irish Language

Material in this subseries relates to the translation services provided by Conradh na Gaeilge to various businesses, consists mainly of correspondence and samples, and is arranged chronologically. It includes a translation of the “Safe Cross Code” (G60/7/7/1), office signage translations (G60/7/7/2) and translations of computer terms (G60/7/7/3). This last file also contains a booklet from siemens about computer translation programmes.

Tag / Ref: G60/7/7

UGA A/A44/43/1/25/13/1 · Item · 1995/10/10-2000/08/31
Part of Academic

Translation of a statement given by Zübeyde Dulaş via an interpreter to the Diyarbakır public prosecutor on 10 October 1995, as submitted by the Turkish Government to the European Court of Human Rights. Quoting the Court, 'According to the statement, thumbprinted by the applicant, the letter from the Ministry of Justice, the appended documents and the application to the European Commission of Human Rights were read out to her through an interpreter and she was asked about them. She acknowledged that the thumbprint on the document was hers and that she did not remember who took the statement. As regarded the events, she could not remember the exact date but about two years before 20 or more army vehicles had come to Çitlibahçe, with soldiers and village guards. They rounded up the villagers and set fire to the houses. After the village burned down, she went to Diyarbakır. The statement recorded that she was shown the application and letter of authority and asked about them. She stated the thumbprints were hers. She said that she thought her application was going to Ankara to claim her rights. She was illiterate and ignorant and did not know anything about European human rights. She made her statement to them as she thought this would get something done about the damage which she had suffered. She wanted the State to vindicate her rights. She did not want to start a case in Europe in the way that [the public prosecutor] had explained and did not agree to foreign lawyers starting such a case. It was for the State to look after her rights. When she made a statement to the HRA, there had been a lot of people with her and they described the events as well. The application which had been read out was accurate though and she had no complaints to make about the person who wrote it down. She had not started any court case in Hazro or Diyarbakır as she was poor and ignorant and did not know what to do.' This statement would subsequently be refuted by Dulaş. (3 copies)

UGA A/A44/43/1/26/6/3 · Item · 1996/04/12-1999/09/06
Part of Academic

English translations of documents pertaining to the Cizre Public Prosecutor’s investigation of the death of Mesut Dündar submitted by the Turkish Government to the European Court of Human Rights on 15 November 1999. Turkish-language copies of these documents are located in A44/43/1/26/6/1. Includes:
1) Statement of Zübeyir Dündar to the Cizre Public Prosecutor, 12 April 1996;
2) Statement of Esvet Dündar to the Cizre Public Prosecutor, 17 April 1996;
3) Statement of Abdülaziz Dündar to the Cizre Public Prosecutor, 18 April 1996;
4) Statement of Ramazan Imrağ, the journalist who took the photographs of Mesut Dündar’s body as seen in the Zübeyir Dündar’s application (A44/43/1/26/2/1), to the Cizre Public Prosecutor, 6 October 1999;
5) Copies of correspondence between the Cizre Public Prosecutor and other public bodies with regards to the investigation.

UGA A/A44/43/1/13/11/2 · Item · 1994/04/04-1999/10/27
Part of Academic

Translations (received 27 October 1999) of internal Turkish Government communications regarding the application of Süheyla Aydın to the European Commission of Human Rights. and the investigation into Necati Aydın's murder created for the legal representatives of Süheyla Aydın. The communications reveal the documents requested by different bodies pertaining to the government's defence against Süheyla Aydın's allegations. The communications also reveal that the Diyarbakır Police requested information on Necati Aydın and Mehmet Ay on 4 April 1994 (the date they were last seen alive at the Diyarbakır State Security Court) as the Police associated the pair with three-previously captured persons accused of working for the PKK.

UGA A/A44/43/1/13/11/3 · Item · 1994/04/04-1998/03/06
Part of Academic

Translations created for the Kurdish Human Rights Project of documents pertaining to the Süheyla Aydın case submitted by the Turkish Government to the European Commission of Human Rights (received 11 May 1998). Includes:
-Appendix 1: Autopsies and corpse examinations of Necati Aydın and Mehmet Ay performed on 9 and 10 April 1994;
-Appendix 2: Report of 18 March 1994 concerning the confiscation of personal belongings taken from Necati Aydın when he was taken into custody and the report of 4 April 1994 relating to their return;
-Annex 3: Contents of the domestic investigation file regarding the murder of Necati Aydın, Mehmet Ay, and Ramazan Keskin. The investigation notes that no new evidence has been found in the case since 3 May 1995 regarding the identification or capture of any perpetrators in the murders.

UGA A/A44/43/1/19/1/11/3 · Item · 2000/10/21
Part of Academic

Translation of the letter of Nejdet Buldan to the Secretary of the European Commission of Human Rights which contained excerpts of a new book by journalist Cüneyt Arcayürek, 'Bir Giden-Bir Gelen-Bir Bekleyen (Tales for Adults, Realities for Children 2 / A Gone-A Come-A Waiting)' which implicates the Government as being complicit in the Savaş Buldan murder.

UGA A/A44/43/1/44/4 · File · 1993/11/24-1994/12/09
Part of Academic

English translations of documents submitted to the European Commission of Human Rights on 23 January 1995 pertaining to the Koçeri Kurt application and the investigation into the death of her son Üzeyir Kurt. Documents include the statement allegedly given by Mrs Kurt to the Bismil Public Prosecutor on 9 December 1994 which stated that she refuted her application and all previous petitions made in her name as 'PKK propaganda' and that she trusts 'her State' to investigate her son's whereabouts; multiple witness statements made by Kurt family members after being taken to the gendarmerie for questions; other statements made by Mrs Kurt to Government officials; and statements from gendarmerie including scene reports.