36pp
Published judgment in the Mahmut Demir case (A44/43/124). Includes published version and web printout version. On 5 December 2002, a friendly settlement was reached in which the Turkish Government paid Demir and Yaşa £116,000 sterling and £89,000 sterling in damages, respectively, and declared ‘that the occurrence of deaths and of grievous injury in the present case and the inadequate investigations that followed constituted a violation of Articles 2 and 13 of the Convention.’ The full judgment (in French) is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-65367. On 5 December 2002, a friendly settlement was reached in which the Turkish Government paid Demir and Yaşa £116,000 sterling and £89,000 sterling in damages, respectively, and declared ‘that the occurrence of deaths and of grievous injury in the present case and the inadequate investigations that followed constituted a violation of Articles 2 and 13 of the Convention.’ The full judgment (in French) is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-65367
Published judgment in the Azize Menteş and others case (A44/43/1/46). On 28 November 1997, the European Court of Human Rights dismissed by 15 votes to 6 the preliminary objection concerning the exhaustion of domestic remedies; held by 16 votes to 5 that there had been a violation of Articles 8 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights with respect to the first three applicants; held unanimously that there had been no violation of Articles 14 and 18 of the Convention with respect to the first three applicants; and held unanimously that there had been no violation of Articles 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 13, 14 and 18 of the Convention with regard to Sariye Uvat. Includes the original bilingual certified copy and a reference photocopy of the English version of the judgment. The full judgment is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-58120
Published judgment in the Gurbetelli Ersöz and others (Özgür Gündem) case (A44/43/1/30). On 16 March 2000, the European Court of Human Rights ruled unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, but not of Article 14. The Government were ordered to pay Ülkem Basın ve Yayıncılık Sanayı Ticaret Ltd 9,000,000,000 Turkish lira, was ordered to pay Çetin and Kaya £5,000 sterling each in non-pecuniary damages, and was ordered to pay the applicants £16,000 sterling in costs and expenses (less 9,195 French francs received in legal aid). The full judgment is available for viewing in English at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58508
Published judgment (including the published version and web printout version) in the Sultan Sabuktekin case (A44/43/1/50). On 4 March 2005, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that it had not been established that violations of the European Convention on Human Rights had occurred. The full judgment is available for viewing in English at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-60310
Printout of the judgment in the Sadak and others v. Turkey (no. 1) case (A44/43/6/72). On 17 July 2001, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that there had been multiple violations of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Turkish Government were ordered to pay the four applicants $100,000 US in non-pecuniary damages and $10,000 US in legal costs and expenses. The full judgment is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-59594
Published judgment in the Behiye Salman case (A44/43/1/51). On 27 June 2000, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that there had been a violation of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights with respected to Agit Salman’s death in custody (16 votes to 1), that there had been violations of Article 2 with regards to the failure to carry out an effective and adequate investigation into the death and of Article 3 (unanimous), that there had been a violation of Article 13 (16 votes to 1), and that Turkey failed to comply with its obligations under former Article 25 § 1 (unanimous). The Turkish Government were ordered to pay Behiye Salman £39,320.64 sterling in pecuniary damages, £35,000 sterling in non-pecuniary damages, and £21,544.58 sterling in legal fees and expenses (less 11,195 French francs awarded in legal aid). The full judgment is available for viewing in English at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-58735
Published judgment in the Sıddık Yaşa case (A44/43/1/24). On 5 December 2002, a friendly settlement was reached in which the Turkish Government paid £89,000 sterling in damages, and declared ‘that the occurrence of deaths and of grievous injury in the present case and the inadequate investigations that followed constituted a violation of Articles 2 and 13 of the Convention.’ The full judgment is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-65367
Published judgment in the Selma Tanrıkulu case (A44/43/1/54). On 18 July 1999, the European Court of Human Rights ruled unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 2 of the Convention on account of the failure of the authorities of the respondent State to conduct an effective investigation into the circumstances of the death of the applicant’s husband, but that it had not been established that the applicant’s husband was killed in violation of Article 2. The Court also ruled that there had been violations of Article 13 and former Article 25 § 1 (16 votes to 1). The Turkish Government were ordered to pay Selma Tanrıkulu and her children £15,000 sterling in non-pecuniary damages and £15,000 sterling in legal fees and expenses (less 13,495 French francs awarded in legal aid). The full judgment is available for viewing in English at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-58289
Manuscript draft and copy of affidavit of AW Hazell, land agent to John Wilson Lynch, giving evidence as to the names of the townlands in the Belvoir estate from previous documents as well as the Ordinance Survey.