Showing 298 results

Additional observations submitted on behalf of the applicant in the Şarlı case on 25 January 1996, primarily consisting of a paper, 'Child Soldiers in Turkey and the Kurdish Conflict', presented for the Quaker United National Office in Geneva by researcher/journalist İsmet G. İmset on 30 November 1995.

Adhesive Post-It notes written by Essex team members pertaining to the Timurtaş case. The notes were originally placed on the inside front cover of the File 1 binder. As per the file's table of contents, Tab 1 originally contained the case correspondence before it outgrew the File 1 binder and was moved to its own separate file (A44/43/1/57/3).

52 colour slides containing aerial photographs of Galway city.

2 aerial photographs of a peninsula in Aghnish Lough, County Donegal.

Aisling Reidy's personal file on the Akkoç case, including copies of correspondence sent to the Essex team from the European Court of Human Rights pertaining to the case, the Report of the Commission on the case (full text available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-46171), the Government's memorial, and materials pertaining to related Kurdish Litigation Project cases.

Materials pertaining to the claims for damages made on behalf of the applicants in the Akdivar and others case (A44/43/12), including notes, correspondence from Tony Fisher (fax paper has faded, making legibility difficult), schedules of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages, the observations of the Turkish Government on the claims, and the response of the applicants to the observations. These documents were presumably used as guides for claims to be made in the Selçuk and Asker case.

3 aerial photographs of headlands at Annestown, County Waterford.

Appendices (in Turkish with English translation) submitted by the applicant in the Salman case alongside her application on 20 May 1993, including the statements of the applicant, her letter to the European Commission of Human Rights authorising Kevin Boyle and Françoise Hampson as her legal representatives, statements of her family's local representatives, decisions of the Adana public prosecutor, Agit Salman's autopsy, petitions to the prosecutor from the Salman family, photos of the body of Agit Salman (GRAPHIC CONTENT WARNING), and a statement of the Diyarbakır Branch of the Human Rights Association on the ineffectiveness of domestic remedies in Turkey.

Documents compiled by the applicant's legal representatives as of 13 November 1997 pertaining to forensic analysis, including copies of post-mortem photographs of Agit Salman's body provided by his family (GRAPHIC CONTENT WARNING), transcripts of statements of police officer witnesses, and copies of articles on post-mortem bruising.

Appendices (in Turkish with English translation) submitted by the applicant in the Cemil Kılıç case alongside his application on 23 September 1993, including: Kılıç's 23 December 1993 request to the Şanlıurfa provincial office for protection for him, his brother, and the Özgür Gündem newspaper offices in Şanlıurfa; the notice of rejection of the request; a witness statement from Ahmet Fidan; statements of Cemil Kılıç; Cemil Kılıç's letter to the European Commission of Human Rights authorising Kevin Boyle and Françoise Hampson as his legal representatives; Kemal Kılıç's autopsy report; and transcripts of telephone conversations involving Kemal Kılıç during February 1992 largely concerning events leading up to the charges which were made against him on 18 January 1992.