Item 27 - Case of İkincisoy v. Turkey (Application no. 26144/95), Judgment (corrected)

Identity area

Reference code

UGA A/A44/43/3/1/27

Title

Case of İkincisoy v. Turkey (Application no. 26144/95), Judgment (corrected)

Date(s)

  • 2005/03/15

Level of description

Item

Extent and medium

37pp

Context area

Archival history

Immediate source of acquisition or transfer

Content and structure area

Scope and content

Corrected published judgment (this version was rectified under Rule 81 of the Rules of the Court) in the Abdurrazak İkincisoy and Halil İkincisoy case (A44/43/1/36). On 27 July 2004, the European Court of Human Rights unanimously ruled: that there had been a violation of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights regarding Mehmet Şah İkincisoy's death the failure to conduct an effective investigations into its circumstances; that there had been violations of Articles 5 § 3, 5 § 4, 5 § 5 with regards to Halil İkincisoy; that there had been a violation of Article 13, and that Turkey failed to comply with its obligations under former Article 25 § 1. The Court unanimously ruled: that there had not been violations of Article 5 §§ 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the Convention with regard to Abdurrazak İkincisoy; no violations of Article 5 §§ 1 with regard to Halil İkincisoy; and no violations of Article 3, 8, 9, and 14. The Turkish Government were ordered to pay Mehmet Şah İkincisoy’s heirs €25,000 in pecuniary damages, €3,500 to Abdurrazak İkincisoy in non-pecuniary damages, €7,500 to Halil İkincisoy in non-pecuniary damages, and €15,000 in legal costs and expenses. The full judgment is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-61940

Appraisal, destruction and scheduling

Corrected published judgment (this version was rectified under Rule 81 of the Rules of the Court) in the Abdurrazak İkincisoy and Halil İkincisoy case (A44/43/1/36). On 27 July 2004, the European Court of Human Rights unanimously ruled: that there had been a violation of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights regarding Mehmet Şah İkincisoy's death the failure to conduct an effective investigations into its circumstances; that there had been violations of Articles 5 § 3, 5 § 4, 5 § 5 with regards to Halil İkincisoy; that there had been a violation of Article 13, and that Turkey failed to comply with its obligations under former Article 25 § 1. The Court unanimously ruled: that there had not been violations of Article 5 §§ 1, 3, 4 and 5 of the Convention with regard to Abdurrazak İkincisoy; no violations of Article 5 §§ 1 with regard to Halil İkincisoy; and no violations of Article 3, 8, 9, and 14. The Turkish Government were ordered to pay Mehmet Şah İkincisoy’s heirs €25,000 in pecuniary damages, €3,500 to Abdurrazak İkincisoy in non-pecuniary damages, €7,500 to Halil İkincisoy in non-pecuniary damages, and €15,000 in legal costs and expenses. The full judgment is available for viewing at https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-61940

Breisiúcháin

System of arrangement

Conditions of access and use area

Conditions governing access

Coinníollacha a rialaíonn atáirgeadh

Teanga an ábhair

  • Béarla

Script of material

    Nótaí teanga agus scripte

    Physical characteristics and technical requirements

    Áiseanna aimsithe

    Allied materials area

    Existence and location of originals

    Existence and location of copies

    Related units of description

    Related descriptions

    Alternative identifier(s)

    Access points

    Subject access points

    Place access points

    Name access points

    Genre access points

    Description identifier

    Institution identifier

    Rules and/or conventions used

    Status

    Level of detail

    Dátaí cruthaithe athbhreithnithe nó scrios

    Language(s)

      Script(s)

        Sources

        Limistéar forshealbhúcháin