Lists of potential donors, list of gifts [donations] received since 22/05/1990 and potential "live prospects" 28/05/1990.

Material relating to the Trinity 400 Campaign to mark the University's 400th anniversary in 1992, primarily concerned with fundraising in Ireland and abroad. File consists of minutes, circulars, campaign brochure and includes agenda and minutes 25/01/1989, 12/04/1989, 05/07/1989, 19/09/1989, 07/11/1989; correspondence relating to fundraising event "Night in the Country", put on by Jim and Kay Canning, including invites, and correspondence relating to auction to help raise funds, 10/07-29/08/1989.

Lists of Irish Major Prospective donors 15/04/1988, 08,10/08/1988, 06/10/1988; list of UK prospects, 05/07/1988; list of US prospects, 25/07/1988; letter from Paul Murphy, Trinity 400 Campaign Development Office, Trinity College Dublin (TCD), to members of the Irish Campaign Council for Trinity 400 Campaign, giving details of donations received as of 21/10/1988 (letter open, list closed).

Material relating to the Trinity 400 Campaign to mark the University's 400th anniversary in 1992, and the campaign council, of which Mary Robinson (MR) was a member, who were primarily concerned with fundraising in Ireland and abroad. File consists of minutes, circulars, campaign brochure and includes letter from Frank J O'Reilly, Chairman of Trinity 400 Campaign, to MR, attaching list of members of council and inviting MR to join, 26/01/1988; minutes 15/04/1988, agenda and minutes 16/08/1988, 19/10/1988, 30/11/1988; expenses for contacts made by MR in San Francisco areas, August 1988; letter from Paul Murphy, Trinity 400 Campaign Development Office, Trinity College Dublin (TCD), to members of the Irish Campaign Council for Trinity 400 Campaign, giving details of donations received as of 21/10/1988 (letter open, list closed); circular from WA Watts, Provost, TCD giving details of press launch of campaign, 03/11/1988.

Correspondence relating to appeal by Professor Jagdish Vij to The Visitors (of Trinity College) and whether payment should be made to cover costs, including from Dermot McAleese. While Vij technically lost his case, the points raised during his appeal and the subsequent findings of the Visitors caused TCD to change its approach to the reorganisation of the administration, as per letter signed by several concerned academics [Fellows?], 02/12/2008.

Correspondence and other material relating to case between Gray Cahill and the Anti Bullying Research and Resource Centre at Trinity College Dublin in which she alleges they wrongfully upheld a claim against her, 17/04-14/11/2007.

Correspondence and other material relating to case of Paula Simmonds against Trinity College Dublin in relation to her issues with workload during her employment at TCD 1966-86 and conditions which led to early retirement, 06/2007-09/08/2007.

Correspondence relating to one board member of Trinity College Dublin (TCD) dissenting on adoption of restructuring and reform recommendations on board agenda, which the member, Professor JK Vik, appealed to The Visitors of TCD, 06-12/07/2007.

Statement from Dr Gerard Morgan (16/01/2007) with compliment slip note (12/[06?]/2007), in relation to allegations made by Dr Stephanie Newell, 06/07/10/2002, and 04/12/2002 and decision by Senior Dean to suspend Morgan from teaching duties and ban him from parts of campus including his office, without consultation, on 07/10/2002.

Material from folder labelled "Trinity College - Patrick Kelly", mainly consisting of correspondence, regarding Mr Kelly's appeals to the Visitors of Trinity College Dublin (TCD). His appeal related to a bullying complaint against one of his tutors which was not upheld and which he then wished to appeal to The Visitors of TCD, which led to a subsequent appeal heard at the Supreme Court. ("Visitors" are part of the oversight structure of Trinity College Dublin). The Visitors decided that they had no jurisdiction to consider the complaint. Kelly sought to apply for the judicial review of this decision of the Visitors on the basis of the "composition of the Visitors and alleges bias" (one had previously been employed by the university and had become a Pro-Chancellor of the university). The Supreme Court held that former employments or associations are insufficient, in the absence of other evidence, to disqualify a person from participating in disciplinary or similar tribunals related to that former employment.